[NTG-context] Re: \setupitemgroup for footnotes

2023-09-26 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
ould be avoided. > > I didn’t say you should avoid it; defining your own version was just the > first idea that I had – and apparently it wasn’t a bad idea. Sorry, Hraban, your proposal works perfectly fine and I really appreciate it. It was only me the one that had the impression that

[NTG-context] Re: \setupitemgroup for footnotes

2023-09-25 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 25.09.23 um 19:19 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez: On 9/25/23 18:19, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Am 25.09.23 um 17:52 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez: [...] Excuse my ignorance, but which is the right way to get the itemize setup only for footnotes? I would use \defineitemgroup to define your own, like

[NTG-context] Re: \setupitemgroup for footnotes

2023-09-25 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 9/25/23 18:19, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 25.09.23 um 17:52 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez: >> [...] >> Excuse my ignorance, but which is the right way to get the itemize setup >> only for footnotes? > > I would use \defineitemgroup to define your own, like "footnoteitemize". Many thanks for

[NTG-context] Re: \setupitemgroup for footnotes

2023-09-25 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 25.09.23 um 17:52 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez: Dear list, I have the following sample (with current latest from 2023.09.18 21:13): \setuppapersize[A6] \starttext \startsetups[forfootnote] \setupitemgroup [itemize][1] [ before={\endgraf{\ttbf

[NTG-context] \setupitemgroup for footnotes

2023-09-25 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Dear list, I have the following sample (with current latest from 2023.09.18 21:13): \setuppapersize[A6] \starttext \startsetups[forfootnote] \setupitemgroup [itemize][1] [ before={\endgraf{\ttbf[before]}\endgraf}, after={\endgraf

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup[itemize],/setupitemize

2019-12-23 Thread Willi Egger
Wolfgang, thank you for this expalantion. Kind regards Willi > On 18 Dec 2019, at 23:15, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > > Willi Egger schrieb am 18.12.2019 um 19:58: >> Wolfgans, Hraban, >> >> thank you very much for this instruction! >> >> - In the real itemlist I have of course

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup[itemize],/setupitemize

2019-12-18 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Willi Egger schrieb am 18.12.2019 um 19:58: Wolfgans, Hraban, thank you very much for this instruction! - In the real itemlist I have of course \startitemize (sorry for the ommission in the MWE - I misinterpreted the Wiki. There is no mentioning in the red section that n is possible. However

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup[itemize],/setupitemize

2019-12-18 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
uot;n" keyword in the same argument as the assignment for the left key which means ConTeXt ignores the keyword because you can't mix both types. The correct setups is: \setupitemgroup[itemize][1][packed,n][width=4em,left={Step~}]

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup[itemize],/setupitemize

2019-12-18 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
ting or is itemize broken? > > > MWE: > % \setupitemize[packed][n,left={Step~},n] > > \setupitemgroup[itemize][1][packed][left={Step~},n] > > \starttext > \startitem > Start with this\dots > \stopitem > \startitem &g

[NTG-context] \setupitemgroup[itemize],/setupitemize

2019-12-18 Thread Willi Egger
Hello everybody, I just wanted to typeset a simple file with a adaptet itemization. Howewer none of the options have effect. Do I miss somehting or is itemize broken? MWE: % \setupitemize[packed][n,left={Step~},n] \setupitemgroup[itemize][1][packed][left={Step~},n] \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] setupitemgroup and 'command='

2017-05-24 Thread Thomas Floeren
Hans, thanks for your swift reply… > On 24. May 2017, at 19:31, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 5/24/2017 6:28 PM, Thomas Floeren wrote: >> Hi, >> I used to use the “command=” parameter when setting up itemize. Now I >> noticed that it introduces a spurious horizontal whitespace

Re: [NTG-context] setupitemgroup and 'command='

2017-05-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 5/24/2017 6:28 PM, Thomas Floeren wrote: Hi, I used to use the “command=” parameter when setting up itemize. Now I noticed that it introduces a spurious horizontal whitespace after the item symbol when the item is of type “\sym{}”. I also noticed that the problem goes away if I use

[NTG-context] setupitemgroup and 'command='

2017-05-24 Thread Thomas Floeren
Hi, I used to use the “command=” parameter when setting up itemize. Now I noticed that it introduces a spurious horizontal whitespace after the item symbol when the item is of type “\sym{}”. I also noticed that the problem goes away if I use “inner=” instead of “command=”. Example:

Re: [NTG-context] How to use \setupitemgroup?

2017-02-04 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
to \setupitemgroup page.) The wiki page says that "\setupitemgroup[.1.][.2.][.3.][.4.] 1: name of the itemgroup to change (e.g. itemize for \startitemize)". And if I wanted to setup my own itemize command, should not I define it first using \defineitemgroup? Ah, I see, I misunderstood your intenti

Re: [NTG-context] How to use \setupitemgroup?

2017-02-04 Thread Csikos Bela
"Thomas A. Schmitz" írta: >On 02/04/2017 10:41 PM, Csikos Bela wrote: >> Dear context users: >> >> I have troubles using \setupitemgroup. I tried to use it based on the >> contextgarden wiki page >> (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setu

Re: [NTG-context] How to use \setupitemgroup?

2017-02-04 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On 02/04/2017 10:41 PM, Csikos Bela wrote: Dear context users: I have troubles using \setupitemgroup. I tried to use it based on the contextgarden wiki page (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupitemgroup), description, but either my understanding how to use it is not correct

[NTG-context] How to use \setupitemgroup?

2017-02-04 Thread Csikos Bela
Dear context users: I have troubles using \setupitemgroup. I tried to use it based on the contextgarden wiki page (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupitemgroup), description, but either my understanding how to use it is not correct or the command doesn't behave as described on the wiki

Re: [NTG-context] question about \setupitemgroup

2016-12-08 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sun, 27 Nov 2016, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: I have the following sample: \setupwhitespace[5em] \startsetups[smallwspa] \setupwhitespace[small] \setupblank[small] \stopsetups \setupitemize[each][indenting=no, setups=smallwspa] The setupitemize command does not

[NTG-context] question about \setupitemgroup

2016-11-27 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Dear list, I have the following sample: \setupwhitespace[5em] \startsetups[smallwspa] \setupwhitespace[small] \setupblank[small] \stopsetups \setupitemize[each][indenting=no, setups=smallwspa] \starttext \input knuth \startitemize

Re: [NTG-context] Question about \setupitemgroup

2016-07-27 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
Hi Wolfgang, I'm confused, it does not work and I can not find the solution Thanks fabrice your output : 1.a. 1.b. 1.c. 2. 3. 4. my output : 1.a b. c. 2. 3. 4. \setupitemgroup [itemize] [color=darkred, distance=\spaceamount, option={packed,fit,intext}] \starttext \startitemize[n

Re: [NTG-context] Question about \setupitemgroup

2016-07-24 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
2016 um 10:28 > Hi Wolfgang, > I thought the keyword to correct the problem was but I repeat this otiens > > 1. > 2.a. > 2.b > > instead of > > 1. > 2.a. > b. > > You need todays beta to get the correct output for the following example > (the \noitem has

Re: [NTG-context] Question about \setupitemgroup

2016-07-23 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
hasn’t thw right defintion in older versions): \setupitemgroup [itemize] [color=darkred, distance=\spaceamount, option={packed,fit,intext}] \starttext \startitemize[n,repeat] \item \input tufte \noitem \startitemize[a] \item \input tufte \item \input

Re: [NTG-context] Question about \setupitemgroup

2016-07-23 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
e1.couvr...@gmail.com> >>> 22. Juli 2016 um 12:32 >>> Hi, >>> I can not find any keyword must be used to get what I want. >>> Thanks, >>> Fabrice >>> >>> \setupbodyfont[pagella,11pt] >>> >>> \setupitemgroup

Re: [NTG-context] Question about \setupitemgroup

2016-07-22 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
t; 22. Juli 2016 um 12:32 >> Hi, >> I can not find any keyword must be used to get what I want. >> Thanks, >> Fabrice >> >> \setupbodyfont[pagella,11pt] >> >> \setupitemgroup >> [itemize] >> [each] >> [color=darkred] >> [

Re: [NTG-context] Question about \setupitemgroup

2016-07-22 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
et what I want. > Thanks, > Fabrice > > \setupbodyfont[pagella,11pt] > > \setupitemgroup > [itemize] > [each] > [color=darkred] > [packed] > > \starttext > > \startitemize[n] > > \item \input tufte > > \item \startitemize[a] > &

Re: [NTG-context] Question about \setupitemgroup

2016-07-22 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Fabrice Couvreur <mailto:fabrice1.couvr...@gmail.com> 22. Juli 2016 um 12:32 Hi, I can not find any keyword must be used to get what I want. Thanks, Fabrice \setupbodyfont[pagella,11pt] \setupitemgroup [itemize] [each] [color=darkred] [packed] \starttext \startitemize[n] \item

[NTG-context] Question about \setupitemgroup

2016-07-22 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
Hi, I can not find any keyword must be used to get what I want. Thanks, Fabrice \setupbodyfont[pagella,11pt] \setupitemgroup [itemize] [each] [color=darkred] [packed] \starttext \startitemize[n] \item \input tufte \item \startitemize[a] \item \input tufte \stopitemize \stopitemize

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup...

2015-10-07 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Willi \setupitemgroup [itemize] [1] [packed] [n,after=] You have keywords and assignments in the same argument which is not supported by context. Change your \setupitemgroup settings to \setupitemgroup [itemize] [1] [packed,n] [before=] and it works. Wo

[NTG-context] \setupitemgroup...

2015-10-07 Thread Willi Egger
Hi all, I tried to setup itemization on three levels. However I do not get the desired result. The setup does not make level one numbered, level two a-b-c and level three with center-dot. What am I missing? Kind regards Willi \setupitemgroup [itemize] [1] [packed

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup...

2015-10-07 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Wolfgang and Willi, Indeed the observation made by Wolfgang is correct, but even upon following those instructions, somehow the level 2 does not work as expected: Best regards: OK PS: Please see the example below: \setupitemgroup [itemize] [1] [packed,n] [after

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup...

2015-10-07 Thread Willi Egger
Wolfgan and Otared, thanks! - stupid me, this version i had before, but then I concentrated on the level two and messed it up. It appears, that the level two does not accept any symbol like 1,r,a. Kind regards Willi > On 7 okt. 2015, at 11:45, Wolfgang Schuster

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup...

2015-10-07 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Otared Kavian 7. Oktober 2015 um 11:27 Hi Wolfgang and Willi, Indeed the observation made by Wolfgang is correct, but even upon following those instructions, somehow the level 2 does not work as expected: You forgot the \item for the second level entries. Wolfgang

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup...

2015-10-07 Thread Willi Egger
Hi Otared and Wolfgang, Gosh! Indeed, my structure was amiss. Sorry for the noise and thank you for pointing this out to me! Kind regards Willi > On 7 okt. 2015, at 12:36, Otared Kavian wrote: > > \starttext > \startitemize > \startitem >

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup...

2015-10-07 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Wolfgang and Willi, Indeed I didn’t pay attention to the content of the example given by Willi… Indeed everything works fine once the spurious \startitemize\stopitemize are replaced with with \startitem\stopitem… The full working example is here: \setupitemgroup [itemize] [1

[NTG-context] \setupitemgroup symbol

2013-02-19 Thread Troy Henderson
I would like to use the section symbol \S as the symbol of an itemized (non-enumerated) list. It seems that the wiki shows 9 predefined bullet types, but I don't see how to use a custom bullet type. Troy ___ If your

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup symbol

2013-02-19 Thread luigi scarso
\definesymbol[100][§] % or \definesymbol[100][\S] \setupitemgroup[symbol=100] \startitemize[100] \item This is a test. \item This is a test. \item This is a test. \item This is a test. \item This is a test. \item This is a test. \item This is a test. \item

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup symbol

2013-02-19 Thread Troy Henderson
\definesymbol[100][§] % or \definesymbol[100][\S] \setupitemgroup[symbol=100] Thank you Troy ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup symbol

2013-02-19 Thread Troy Henderson
\starttext \definesymbol[100][§] % or \definesymbol[100][\S] \setupitemgroup[symbol=100] \startitemize[100] \item This is a test. How can I ensure there is no space between the \S and This is a test? Troy

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup symbol

2013-02-19 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Troy Henderson thend...@gmail.com wrote: \starttext \definesymbol[100][§] % or \definesymbol[100][\S] \setupitemgroup[symbol=100] \startitemize[100] \item This is a test. How can I ensure there is no space between the \S and This is a test? Troy

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup symbol

2013-02-19 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Troy Henderson wrote: \starttext \definesymbol[100][§] % or \definesymbol[100][\S] \setupitemgroup[symbol=100] \startitemize[100] \item This is a test. How can I ensure there is no space between the \S and This is a test? \startitemize[100,fit

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup symbol

2013-02-19 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 19.02.2013 um 18:32 schrieb luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Troy Henderson thend...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to use the section symbol \S as the symbol of an itemized (non-enumerated) list. It seems that the wiki shows 9 predefined bullet types,

Re: [NTG-context] \setupitemgroup symbol

2013-02-19 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 19.02.2013 um 19:25 schrieb luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Troy Henderson thend...@gmail.com wrote: \starttext \definesymbol[100][§] % or \definesymbol[100][\S] \setupitemgroup[symbol=100] \startitemize[100] \item This is a test. How can I